KoalaGainsKoalaGains iconKoalaGains logo
Log in →
  1. Home
  2. US Stocks
  3. Banks
  4. CFFI

Our definitive January 10, 2026 report on C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) provides a multi-faceted analysis of its business, financials, and valuation. By benchmarking CFFI against competitors such as Atlantic Union Bankshares and applying the investment philosophies of Buffett and Munger, we uncover the key factors driving its stock.

C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI)

C&F Financial Corporation presents a mixed outlook for investors. The company's unique model combines stable community banking with a higher-return auto lending business. It demonstrates strong growth in core loans and deposits and is very friendly to shareholders. However, this is offset by a significant decline in profitability since 2022. The business is also exposed to cyclical auto and mortgage markets, and its cash flow is inconsistent. Increasing provisions for loan losses signal potential concerns about future credit quality. The stock appears fairly valued, balancing its stable core with these notable risks.

US: NASDAQ

60%
Current Price
--
52 Week Range
--
Market Cap
--
EPS (Diluted TTM)
--
P/E Ratio
--
Forward P/E
--
Avg Volume (3M)
--
Day Volume
--
Total Revenue (TTM)
--
Net Income (TTM)
--
Annual Dividend
--
Dividend Yield
--

Summary Analysis

Business & Moat Analysis

4/5

C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is a bank holding company that operates a diversified financial services business through three distinct segments: Community Banking, Mortgage Banking, and Consumer Finance. The core of the company is C&F Bank, a traditional community bank serving individuals and businesses in eastern and central Virginia with standard deposit and loan products. Complementing this is C&F Mortgage Corporation, which originates residential mortgages across the mid-Atlantic region and sells most of them on the secondary market, generating fee income. The third pillar is C&F Finance Company, a specialized division that purchases and services non-prime auto loans from a network of car dealerships across several states. This diversified structure is somewhat unique for an institution of its size, allowing it to generate revenue from different economic activities and customer types. For fiscal year 2024, the Community Banking segment was the largest contributor to revenue at approximately $89.28 million, followed by Consumer Finance at $27.05 million and Mortgage Banking at $12.12 million, making up roughly 70%, 21%, and 10% of revenues respectively.

The Community Banking segment forms the bedrock of C&F's operations, contributing the majority of its revenue ($89.28 million, or 70%). This division provides traditional banking services, including checking and savings accounts, commercial loans, real estate loans, and wealth management to local customers in Virginia. The U.S. regional and community banking market is a mature, multi-trillion dollar industry with low single-digit annual growth, characterized by intense competition and relatively stable profit margins that are heavily influenced by interest rate spreads. C&F competes directly with other local Virginia banks like TowneBank and Atlantic Union Bankshares, as well as larger national players like Bank of America and Wells Fargo that have a significant presence in its markets. The primary consumers are local individuals, families, and small-to-medium-sized businesses who value personalized service and local decision-making. Customer stickiness in community banking is typically high due to the inconvenience of switching primary bank accounts and the trust built through long-term relationships. C&F's moat in this segment is its localized brand recognition and deep community ties built over decades, which create a stable, low-cost deposit base—a significant competitive advantage that is difficult for larger, less personal competitors to replicate.

The Consumer Finance segment, generating $27.05 million in revenue (21%), represents C&F's most distinct and high-yield niche. This division focuses on the non-prime automobile financing market, a segment of the larger $1.5 trillion U.S. auto loan market known for higher risk and higher returns. The market for non-prime auto loans is highly fragmented and competitive, with players ranging from specialized finance companies to credit unions and dedicated arms of larger banks. C&F's primary competitors are other specialized non-prime lenders. The customers are individuals with sub-par credit who are purchasing used vehicles, making them highly sensitive to monthly payment amounts. Stickiness to the lender (C&F) is low, as the primary relationship is with the auto dealership; however, C&F builds loyalty with the dealerships themselves to secure a steady flow of loan applications. The competitive advantage, or moat, in this business is not brand-based but rather operational. It hinges on sophisticated, data-driven underwriting models to accurately price risk and maintain dealer relationships. This niche allows C&F to deploy its low-cost deposits into higher-yielding assets, boosting its overall net interest margin, but it also exposes the company to greater credit risk, especially during economic downturns when defaults in this consumer segment tend to rise significantly.

The Mortgage Banking segment is the smallest but an important source of fee income, contributing $12.12 million (10%) to revenue. This division originates conventional, FHA, and VA residential mortgages, which are then predominantly sold to investors in the secondary market. The U.S. residential mortgage market is vast but intensely cyclical and hyper-competitive, with market size fluctuating dramatically based on interest rates and housing market activity. Profit margins are often thin. C&F competes against a wide array of players, from national non-bank lenders like Rocket Mortgage to the mortgage divisions of money-center banks and local credit unions. Its customers are homebuyers, for whom the transaction is often a one-time event, resulting in virtually no customer stickiness to the mortgage originator. The competitive position for a smaller player like C&F relies heavily on its relationships with local real estate agents and a reputation for reliable service and timely closings. This segment provides valuable non-interest income, diversifying revenue away from the net interest spread, but its performance is highly volatile and directly tied to the health of the housing market and interest rate trends, making it an unreliable contributor to earnings.

In conclusion, C&F's business model is a tale of three distinct operations with different risk-return profiles. The community banking segment provides a stable, low-cost funding foundation built on a traditional moat of local relationships and customer loyalty. This core operation is the company's most durable and resilient component. This stability allows the company to pursue higher-growth, higher-risk ventures in non-prime auto lending and mortgage banking. While the Consumer Finance division has carved out a profitable niche through specialized underwriting, its moat is operational rather than structural and carries significant credit risk. The Mortgage Banking arm offers revenue diversification but lacks a strong moat and is subject to high cyclicality. The primary vulnerability in C&F's model is its exposure to economic cycles through its non-bank segments, which could pressure earnings during a recession. However, its diversified approach provides more avenues for growth than a typical community bank. The durability of its competitive edge rests almost entirely on the stability of its core banking franchise and its disciplined execution in its riskier ventures.

Financial Statement Analysis

4/5

A quick health check on C&F Financial reveals a profitable and fundamentally sound community bank, though with some inconsistencies. The company is solidly profitable, reporting net income of $7.08 million in its most recent quarter (Q3 2025) on revenue of $33.12 million. The critical question is whether it generates real cash. Here, the picture is mixed. In Q3, it produced strong operating cash flow of $23.44 million, easily covering its profit. However, the prior quarter saw a negative cash flow of -$4.39 million, indicating significant volatility. From a safety perspective, the balance sheet appears secure. The bank is primarily funded by $2.3 billion in customer deposits rather than wholesale borrowing, and its debt-to-equity ratio is a manageable 0.46. The main near-term stress is the unpredictable cash flow, which can make it harder to assess the bank's ability to consistently fund its operations and growth without relying on financing activities.

The bank's income statement demonstrates solid profitability and effective management of its core lending operations. Revenue has been steady, recorded at $33.12 million in Q3 2025 after $34.26 million in Q2. More importantly, Net Interest Income—the bank's primary source of earnings from loans and deposits—has been growing, reaching $27.17 million in Q3, up 10.06% from the prior year. This growth is a strong signal that the bank is successfully navigating the interest rate environment, earning more on its assets than it is paying out on its liabilities. This suggests healthy pricing power on its loans and disciplined cost control on its deposit funding, which is crucial for a regional bank's long-term success. Net income remains robust, underscoring the strength of its earnings power.

While the company is profitable, a deeper look is needed to see if those earnings are consistently converting into cash. In the most recent quarter, cash conversion was excellent, with cash from operations (CFO) of $23.44 million far exceeding the reported net income of $7.08 million. This was largely driven by a significant increase in customer deposits ($41.72 million), a positive sign of customer trust and a stable funding source. However, this strength was not present in the prior quarter, where CFO was negative at -$4.39 million despite a net income of $7.69 million. This volatility suggests that the timing of cash movements related to its lending and deposit activities can cause significant short-term swings. This doesn't necessarily mean the earnings are not 'real,' but it does mean that investors should not expect a smooth, predictable cash flow stream every single quarter.

The balance sheet provides a picture of resilience and conservative management. With total assets of $2.71 billion as of Q3 2025, the bank's foundation looks secure. A key indicator of a bank's risk appetite, the loans-to-deposits ratio, stands at a healthy 85.7% ($1.97 billion in net loans vs. $2.3 billion in deposits). This is a prudent level, indicating that the bank is not over-extending itself and has a solid base of customer deposits to fund its lending activities. Furthermore, its leverage is modest, with a total debt-to-equity ratio of 0.46. This strong deposit funding and moderate leverage mean the bank is well-positioned to handle economic shocks. Overall, C&F Financial's balance sheet can be classified as safe.

The company's cash flow engine, which shows how it funds its day-to-day business, is primarily driven by its core banking activities of taking deposits and making loans. As seen recently, the cash generated from operations can be uneven, swinging positive in one quarter and negative in the next. Capital expenditures are minimal at just $0.74 million in the last quarter, which is typical for a bank and suggests spending is focused on maintaining existing operations rather than aggressive expansion. The free cash flow, when positive, is primarily directed toward shareholder returns and strengthening the balance sheet. For instance, in Q3 2025, the company paid down a net $32.64 million in debt and paid $1.49 million in dividends. While the cash generation appears dependable over the long run, its quarter-to-quarter unevenness is a notable characteristic.

C&F Financial demonstrates a commitment to shareholder returns, which appear sustainable based on its current financial strength. The company pays a regular quarterly dividend, recently $0.46 per share, which has grown by 4.55% over the past year. Critically, the dividend is well-covered by earnings, with a low payout ratio of just 22.74%. This means less than a quarter of its profits are used for dividends, leaving plenty of capital to reinvest in the business or absorb potential losses. While the dividend was not covered by the negative free cash flow in Q2, it was comfortably covered by the strong cash flow in Q3. The company is also creating value for shareholders by reducing its share count, although modestly. This capital allocation strategy—paying a sustainable dividend while maintaining a strong balance sheet—is prudent and investor-friendly.

In summary, C&F Financial's current financial statements reveal several key strengths alongside notable risks. The biggest strengths are its consistent profitability, evidenced by a return on assets of 1.05%, its safe and deposit-funded balance sheet with a loans-to-deposits ratio of 85.7%, and its sustainable and growing dividend backed by a low payout ratio of 22.74%. However, investors should be aware of two red flags. First is the volatile and unpredictable nature of its operating cash flow, which complicates short-term analysis. Second is the recent increase in the provision for credit losses, which rose to $2.9 million in Q3, signaling that management may be anticipating future economic headwinds. Overall, the company's financial foundation looks stable, anchored by its core profitability and conservative balance sheet, but the cash flow inconsistency and credit provisioning warrant close monitoring.

Past Performance

3/5

When analyzing C&F Financial Corporation's historical performance, a distinct pattern emerges. Over a five-year horizon (FY2020-FY2024), the bank shows solid foundational growth. Gross loans expanded at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 9.1%, while total deposits grew at a 5.5% CAGR. This indicates a healthy, expanding franchise. However, a shorter three-year view reveals a significant deceleration in profitability. While loan growth remained robust at an 8.3% CAGR over the last three years, earnings per share (EPS) declined at a painful -15% CAGR during the same period. The latest fiscal year continued this negative trend, with EPS falling 13.1% year-over-year. This contrast between strong balance sheet expansion and weakening profitability is the central story of the bank's recent past.

The divergence is largely explained by pressures seen on the income statement, particularly in the last two years. While Net Interest Income (NII), the bank's primary revenue source, grew steadily to a peak of $97.71 million in 2023, it slightly declined in 2024 to $96.78 million despite a larger loan book. The cause was a massive surge in interest expense paid on deposits, which ballooned from $5.2 million in 2022 to $42.8 million in 2024 as interest rates rose. This margin compression, combined with a significant increase in the provision for loan losses from $3.17 million in 2022 to $13.25 million in 2024, directly led to a collapse in profitability. Net income peaked at $29.16 million in 2022 before falling sharply to $19.83 million in 2024, erasing the strong gains made in prior years.

From a balance sheet perspective, the company's foundation appears stable and growing. The consistent expansion of the loan portfolio from $1.36 billion to $1.92 billion and the deposit base from $1.75 billion to $2.17 billion over five years are key strengths. This growth has been funded prudently, with the loan-to-deposit ratio remaining at a reasonable 88%. While total debt has increased from $88.8 million to $129.5 million over the period, the bank's leverage remains manageable with a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.57. A strong positive signal is the steady growth in book value per share, which climbed from $52.80 in 2020 to $70.00 in 2024, reflecting underlying value creation for shareholders even as earnings have faltered.

An analysis of the company's cash flow statement reveals some volatility, which is not unusual for a bank whose operating cash flows are heavily influenced by changes in deposits and loans. The bank reported negative operating cash flow in FY2020 but generated positive and substantial cash flow in the following four years. Notably, free cash flow (defined as operating cash flow less capital expenditures) has consistently exceeded net income since 2021. For example, in FY2024, free cash flow was $35 million compared to a net income of $19.8 million. This suggests high-quality earnings and that the company generates more than enough cash to fund its operations and shareholder returns.

On the shareholder front, C&F Financial has executed a clear and consistent capital return policy. The company has reliably paid a quarterly dividend, increasing the annual payout per share from $1.52 in 2020 to $1.76 by 2023, where it held steady in 2024. This demonstrates a commitment to providing a steady income stream to its investors. In addition to dividends, management has been actively repurchasing shares. The total number of shares outstanding has been reduced from 3.68 million at the end of fiscal 2020 to 3.24 million by the end of 2024, a significant reduction of approximately 12%. This dual approach of dividends and buybacks is a strong signal of a shareholder-focused management team.

This capital allocation strategy has been beneficial for per-share metrics and appears sustainable. The dividend payout ratio has remained conservative, recently standing at 29.1% of earnings, leaving plenty of room for future payments or increases. The annual dividend payment of approximately $5.8 million is easily covered by the company's recent free cash flow generation of $35 million. The share buybacks have also provided support to EPS. While five-year EPS growth is nearly flat ($6.06 in 2020 to $6.01 in 2024), this was achieved despite net income declining over the same period. The buybacks effectively prevented a worse per-share outcome. Overall, the company's capital allocation has been a historical strength, though it could not fully offset the recent operational challenges.

In conclusion, C&F Financial's historical record provides mixed signals. The bank's past performance shows a clear ability to grow its core banking franchise and a strong, shareholder-friendly capital return program. These are significant long-term strengths. However, the performance has been choppy, marked by a severe downturn in profitability over the past two years. The single biggest historical weakness is this recent inability to protect margins and earnings from higher interest rates and credit normalization. While the balance sheet and capital returns inspire confidence, the earnings trend raises questions about the bank's resilience through different economic cycles.

Future Growth

1/5

The U.S. regional and community banking industry is navigating a period of significant change, with the next 3-5 years likely to be defined by three key trends: continued consolidation, the acceleration of digital transformation, and adaptation to a fluctuating interest rate environment. Consolidation is being driven by the high fixed costs of regulation and technology, which create scale advantages, making it harder for smaller banks to compete. The industry has seen the number of community banks decline steadily for years, a trend expected to persist. Concurrently, customer expectations are shifting rapidly towards digital-first engagement, forcing banks to invest heavily in mobile apps, online account opening, and digital payment solutions. The adoption rate for mobile banking is projected to exceed 70% of bank customers in the next few years, making digital capabilities a critical competitive factor. Finally, after a period of rapid rate hikes, the industry now faces uncertainty. A potential easing of rates could relieve pressure on deposit costs but may also compress net interest margins (NIMs), a key profitability metric. The overall market for community bank loans is expected to grow at a slow pace, likely in the 2-4% CAGR range, mirroring modest economic growth.

Catalysts for demand in the community banking sector over the next few years include a potential resurgence in the housing market if mortgage rates decline, which would boost both mortgage and construction lending. Additionally, a stable economic environment could fuel loan demand from the small and medium-sized businesses that form the core clientele of community banks. However, competitive intensity is set to increase. The barriers to entry for starting a new bank are high due to capital and regulatory requirements, but competition from non-bank fintech lenders and large national banks with massive technology budgets is fierce. Fintechs are unbundling traditional banking services, attacking profitable niches like payments and personal loans, while large banks leverage their scale to offer more sophisticated digital products and competitive pricing. For community banks like C&F, survival and growth will depend on their ability to defend their local market share through superior customer service while judiciously investing in technology to meet evolving customer needs. Success will be defined by maintaining their core advantage in relationship-based banking while not falling too far behind on the digital front.

C&F's core Community Banking segment, which generates the majority of its revenue ($89.28 million), is the foundation of its business. Current consumption of its products—commercial loans, real estate lending, and deposit accounts—is constrained by its limited geographic footprint in eastern and central Virginia and the intense competition within those markets. Growth is directly tied to the economic health of this specific region. Over the next 3-5 years, growth in this segment is expected to be modest, driven by small business expansion and local real estate development. The primary catalyst would be a stronger-than-expected regional economy. Consumption will likely shift further towards digital channels, pressuring the bank to enhance its online and mobile platforms. The market for community banking services is mature, with growth likely mirroring regional GDP. C&F competes with local players like TowneBank and Atlantic Union Bankshares, as well as national giants. It outperforms by leveraging its deep community ties and personalized service, which fosters a loyal, low-cost deposit base. However, larger competitors with superior digital offerings are likely to win share among younger, more tech-savvy customers. The number of community banks is expected to continue decreasing due to M&A, as scale becomes more important. A key future risk for C&F is a localized recession in its Virginia markets (medium probability), which would depress loan demand and increase credit losses. Another risk is falling behind technologically (high probability), leading to deposit outflows to more convenient competitors.

The Consumer Finance segment, focused on non-prime auto loans, is C&F's high-growth engine, contributing $27.05 million in revenue. Current consumption is limited by the bank's own underwriting standards and its ability to maintain and expand its network of auto dealership partners. The non-prime auto finance market is estimated to be over $200 billion. Over the next 3-5 years, this segment's growth will be heavily influenced by macroeconomic conditions. A mild economic slowdown could increase the pool of non-prime borrowers, but a severe recession would lead to a sharp rise in defaults. Growth will primarily come from deepening relationships with existing dealers and cautiously expanding into new territories. The key catalyst would be a resilient job market among lower-income consumers. Competition is fragmented, with specialized finance companies, credit unions, and other niche lenders. Customers (via dealers) choose based on speed of approval and the lender's willingness to finance a specific risk profile. C&F outperforms through its disciplined underwriting models and consistent service to its dealer network. However, larger, more aggressive lenders could take share by loosening credit standards or offering more attractive terms to dealers. The number of companies in this vertical may consolidate as regulatory costs rise. The most significant risk is a spike in credit losses due to an economic downturn (high probability). A 1% increase in the net charge-off rate could erase a substantial portion of the segment's profits. Another risk is increased regulatory scrutiny of non-prime lending practices (medium probability), which could impose new compliance costs or limit pricing flexibility.

The Mortgage Banking segment ($12.12 million in revenue) is the most volatile part of C&F's business. Current activity is severely constrained by high mortgage rates, which have crushed housing affordability and reduced both home sales and refinancing volumes. The entire U.S. mortgage market, which saw over $4 trillion in originations in 2021, has shrunk to less than half that size. The future of this segment is almost entirely dependent on the direction of interest rates. If the Federal Reserve begins to cut rates, a significant rebound in both purchase and refinance originations is expected. The Mortgage Bankers Association forecasts a potential 20-30% increase in origination volume in the year following a sustained drop in rates. This represents the single largest potential catalyst for C&F. However, competition is brutal. C&F competes against massive non-bank originators like Rocket Mortgage and the mortgage divisions of money-center banks. It wins business based on relationships with local real estate agents and a reputation for reliable closings, but it has no pricing power or scale advantage. National lenders are most likely to win the majority of the market share when volume returns. The number of mortgage companies has already decreased, and this trend will continue as smaller players are squeezed out. The primary risk is that interest rates remain higher for longer (high probability), keeping mortgage volumes depressed and the segment unprofitable. A second risk is a sharp decline in home prices (medium probability), which would reduce demand for purchase mortgages and increase risk on the small portfolio of loans it may hold.

Ultimately, C&F's future growth hinges on a delicate balancing act. The stable, slow-growing community bank provides the low-cost funding that fuels the higher-risk, higher-return consumer finance and mortgage operations. This structure gives it a potential return profile superior to that of a plain-vanilla community bank, but it also exposes it to significantly more volatility and credit risk. Management's key challenge will be managing the credit quality of the non-prime auto portfolio during the next economic downturn, as this segment's performance will have an outsized impact on the company's overall earnings. While the mortgage segment offers significant upside potential in a lower-rate environment, its contribution is unreliable. Therefore, investors are betting on management's ability to navigate the economic cycle with its specialized lending businesses without incurring debilitating losses that would erase the benefits of its diversification. The company's future performance will likely be far more cyclical than its community bank peers.

Fair Value

3/5

As of early 2026, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI), a community bank with a market cap of approximately $226 million, trades with value-oriented metrics. Its Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio stands at a low 8.6x, and its Price-to-Tangible Book Value (P/TBV) is around 1.0x, meaning the stock is priced close to its net tangible asset value. While the 2.6% dividend yield is secure, the market's caution is reflected in the stock trading in the lower half of its 52-week range. The lack of significant analyst coverage for this small-cap bank means investors must rely more heavily on their own fundamental analysis, as there is no external consensus to guide expectations.

Intrinsic valuation models suggest the stock is trading within a reasonable range. A Dividend Discount Model (DDM), suitable for a stable dividend-paying bank, yields a fair value between $65 and $86, assuming conservative long-term growth and a 9%-11% discount rate. This cash-flow-based view indicates that the current price of around $69.80 is not excessively cheap or expensive, but sits toward the lower end of its estimated intrinsic worth. This suggests a built-in margin of safety for investors focused on the company's direct returns to shareholders.

Cross-checking this with other metrics reinforces a mixed but slightly positive picture. The shareholder yield, combining dividends and buybacks, is an attractive 5.64%, providing a strong and tangible return. Historically, CFFI's current P/E and P/B multiples are right in line with its five-year averages, suggesting it is neither unusually cheap nor expensive compared to its own past performance. When compared to peers, CFFI trades at a significant discount on a P/E basis, which seems justified by its smaller scale and weaker operational efficiency. After applying a reasonable discount to peer multiples, a fair value range of $82-$94 is derived, supporting the idea of some upside potential.

Triangulating these valuation methods leads to a final fair value range of $73 to $90, with a midpoint of $81.50. This implies a modest potential upside of about 17% from its current price. For investors, this suggests a 'Buy Zone' below $70, where a sufficient margin of safety exists. The valuation is highly sensitive to the P/E multiple the market is willing to assign, meaning a shift in investor sentiment could significantly impact the stock price. Overall, the analysis points to a modestly undervalued stock, balanced by clear operational challenges.

Future Risks

  • C&F Financial Corporation faces significant profitability pressure from the uncertain interest rate environment, which can squeeze its lending margins. The company is also vulnerable to an economic downturn, which could lead to higher loan defaults, particularly within its commercial real estate and consumer auto loan portfolios. Additionally, intense competition from larger national banks and agile fintech companies threatens its long-term growth and market share. Investors should carefully monitor the bank's net interest margin, credit quality trends, and its ability to retain customers in a competitive digital landscape.

Wisdom of Top Value Investors

Warren Buffett

Warren Buffett would view C&F Financial Corporation as a classic, understandable community bank with a durable history and a conservatively managed balance sheet, reflected in its strong capital ratios (CET1 ratio > 12%). He would be drawn to its attractive valuation, trading at a significant discount to book value (P/B ratio of ~0.8x), which provides a clear margin of safety. However, he would likely pause at its 'fair' but not 'wonderful' quality, noting its modest profitability (Return on Assets of ~0.8% vs. the 1.0%+ of top-tier peers) and limited growth prospects. For retail investors, the takeaway is that while CFFI is a safe and inexpensive stock, Buffett would likely pass on it, preferring to invest in a higher-quality competitor like TowneBank that demonstrates superior earning power, even at a higher price.

Charlie Munger

Charlie Munger would view C&F Financial Corporation as a classic example of a decent, but not great, business available at a fair price. He would first establish his thesis for investing in banks: seeking disciplined institutions with low-cost, stable deposits, a history of avoiding foolish credit mistakes, and management that acts like long-term owners. Munger would appreciate CFFI's conservatism, evidenced by its strong capital position with a CET1 ratio over 12%, which provides a significant buffer against economic downturns. However, he would be concerned by the bank's high efficiency ratio of around 70%, which indicates it is less cost-effective than top-tier peers, and its limited growth prospects in mature markets. While the valuation, trading at a Price-to-Book ratio of 0.8x, offers a margin of safety, Munger prioritizes business quality over statistical cheapness and would likely pass on CFFI in search of a superior franchise. For retail investors, the takeaway is that while CFFI is a stable, low-risk bank, it lacks the compounding power that creates exceptional long-term wealth.

CFFI's management primarily uses its cash to reward shareholders through dividends, offering a yield around 4.0%. This is a rational strategy for a mature company with limited high-return reinvestment opportunities and is a more generous payout than many growth-oriented peers. This capital return policy supports shareholder value in a stable manner but underscores the company's lack of a significant growth engine.

If forced to choose the best banks in this region, Munger would gravitate towards quality. He would likely select TowneBank (TOWN) for its unique relationship-based moat and superior profitability (ROA > 1.0%), Burke & Herbert (BHRB) for its combination of high profitability (ROA > 1.0%) and a fair valuation (P/B < 1.0x), and Atlantic Union Bankshares (AUB) for its market-leading scale and efficiency. Munger would likely avoid CFFI because its mediocre profitability (ROA ~0.8%) and lack of a distinct competitive advantage do not meet his high bar for a long-term investment. His decision might change if CFFI's valuation became overwhelmingly cheap, perhaps falling below 0.6x its tangible book value, creating an exceptional margin of safety.

Bill Ackman

Bill Ackman would view C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) in 2025 as a fundamentally sound but ultimately uninvestable community bank. His investment thesis for the banking sector focuses on high-quality, scalable franchises with dominant market positions, pricing power, and a clear catalyst to unlock value, which CFFI lacks. While Ackman would appreciate the company's consistent profitability, with a Return on Equity (ROE) often near 10%, and its cheap valuation, trading at a Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio around 0.8x, he would be deterred by its small size and limited growth prospects. The bank's high efficiency ratio of approximately 70% indicates operational mediocrity, and its lack of scale makes it an impractical vehicle for deploying significant capital. For retail investors, the key takeaway is that while CFFI is a stable, undervalued bank, it does not possess the qualities of a dominant, high-growth compounder or a compelling turnaround story that would attract an investor like Bill Ackman, who would ultimately avoid the stock. If forced to choose the best regional banks in the area, Ackman would favor TowneBank (TOWN) for its unique high-touch service model and superior profitability (ROA > 1.0%), Atlantic Union Bankshares (AUB) for its market dominance and scale, and Burke & Herbert (BHRB) for its high-quality earnings and post-IPO catalyst potential. Ackman might become interested in CFFI only if it became a clear acquisition target in a wave of industry consolidation, providing an event-driven path to realizing its underlying value.

Competition

C&F Financial Corporation operates as a classic community bank, deeply embedded in its local Virginia markets. Its strategy revolves around building long-term customer relationships, which provides a stable base of low-cost deposits and a loyal lending clientele. Unlike larger regional banks that might pursue aggressive expansion or acquisitions, CFFI has historically maintained a more cautious and organic growth path. This approach helps insulate it from the risks of rapid, poorly integrated expansion but also caps its potential for explosive growth, often resulting in stock performance that is steady but unspectacular compared to more dynamic peers.

The competitive landscape for community banks like CFFI is intense. It faces pressure not only from other local banks of similar size but also from the regional and national giants that have a significant presence in its core markets. These larger competitors often boast superior technology, broader product suites, and greater economies of scale, allowing them to offer more competitive rates or invest more heavily in digital banking platforms. CFFI's competitive advantage, therefore, hinges on its ability to offer personalized service and leverage its local market knowledge to make prudent lending decisions that larger, more bureaucratic institutions might overlook.

From an investor's perspective, CFFI's value proposition is tied to its stability and income generation. The bank has a long history of paying consistent dividends, making it attractive in an income-focused portfolio. However, the stock's valuation often reflects its slower growth prospects. Key challenges moving forward will include navigating the interest rate environment, which directly impacts its core profitability metric (Net Interest Margin), and investing sufficiently in technology to meet evolving customer expectations without eroding its efficiency. Its success will depend on striking a balance between its traditional, relationship-based model and the modern demands of the banking industry.

  • FVCBankcorp, Inc.

    FVCB • NASDAQ CAPITAL MARKET

    FVCBankcorp (FVCB) presents a compelling alternative to C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI), particularly for investors focused on growth within the same Virginia banking market. While both are community banks of similar asset size, FVCB has demonstrated a more aggressive growth strategy, resulting in faster expansion of its loan portfolio and revenue base. CFFI, in contrast, offers a more conservative and traditionally stable profile, with a stronger emphasis on dividend income and a more seasoned, less growth-oriented loan book. The choice between them hinges on an investor's preference for FVCB's dynamic growth potential versus CFFI's established stability and yield.

    In terms of business and moat, FVCB focuses on the competitive Northern Virginia market, targeting commercial businesses, which creates a concentrated but high-growth niche. CFFI has a more geographically diverse footprint across Virginia, serving a mix of retail and small business customers. CFFI's brand is older and more established in its communities, suggesting stronger brand loyalty (90+ years of operation). FVCB, being younger, builds its moat on specialized commercial lending expertise. Both face similar switching costs typical of banking. On scale, they are very similar, with total assets around $2.5 billion. Both have regulatory barriers common to all banks, with solid capital ratios (CET1 ratio > 10%). However, FVCB's focused commercial strategy gives it a slight edge in a high-value niche. Winner: FVCBankcorp, Inc. for its stronger moat in a lucrative commercial market.

    Financially, FVCB has historically shown stronger top-line growth. In a recent trailing twelve months (TTM) period, FVCB's revenue growth outpaced CFFI's, which was relatively flat. CFFI is better on core profitability, often posting a higher Net Interest Margin (NIM), a key metric of loan profitability, around 3.25% compared to FVCB's sub-3.00%. CFFI also tends to have a better Return on Equity (ROE), often above 10%, indicating more efficient use of shareholder capital, whereas FVCB's ROE has been more volatile. Both maintain healthy balance sheets with adequate liquidity, but CFFI's higher profitability metrics give it a clear advantage in financial efficiency. Winner: C&F Financial Corporation due to superior and more consistent profitability margins and returns.

    Looking at past performance, FVCB has delivered stronger growth over the last five years, with its revenue and earnings per share (EPS) CAGR significantly outpacing CFFI's more modest single-digit growth. CFFI's margin trend has been more stable, avoiding the compression FVCB has seen in certain rate cycles. In terms of total shareholder return (TSR), FVCB has shown periods of higher returns, but also greater volatility and a larger maximum drawdown during market downturns. CFFI's stock performance has been less volatile, reflecting its stable, dividend-paying nature (Beta < 0.8). FVCB wins on growth, while CFFI wins on risk and stability. Overall, FVCB's superior growth makes it the winner here for investors with a longer time horizon. Winner: FVCBankcorp, Inc. based on its historical growth achievements.

    For future growth, FVCB's location in the economically vibrant Northern Virginia market provides a significant tailwind. This area has strong commercial and real estate development, offering more robust loan demand. CFFI's markets are more mature, suggesting slower, more incremental growth opportunities. FVCB's pipeline is therefore inherently more promising for commercial loan origination. CFFI's growth is more likely to come from cost efficiencies and gradual market share gains. Consensus estimates often project higher EPS growth for FVCB than for CFFI. The primary risk for FVCB is its concentration in commercial real estate, which is more economically sensitive. Winner: FVCBankcorp, Inc. due to its superior market dynamics and clearer path to organic growth.

    From a valuation perspective, CFFI typically trades at a lower multiple, making it appear cheaper. Its Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio often sits below 1.0x (e.g., 0.8x), suggesting the stock is trading for less than the stated value of its assets, which can be a sign of value. FVCB, due to its growth profile, has historically commanded a higher P/B ratio, sometimes above 1.0x. CFFI also offers a substantially higher dividend yield, often around 4.0% compared to FVCB's 1.5%. This makes CFFI more attractive from an income standpoint. While FVCB's premium may be justified by its growth, CFFI's discount to book value and high yield present a more compelling value proposition today. Winner: C&F Financial Corporation for its more attractive risk-adjusted valuation and superior dividend yield.

    Winner: FVCBankcorp, Inc. over C&F Financial Corporation. While CFFI is a more profitable and cheaper stock with a better dividend, FVCB's superior growth profile—both historically and prospectively—gives it the decisive edge for investors seeking capital appreciation. FVCB's key strength is its strategic focus on the high-growth Northern Virginia commercial market, which fuels its loan and revenue expansion. Its weakness is a higher valuation and more volatile earnings stream tied to economic cycles. CFFI's strengths are its consistent profitability (ROE > 10%) and valuation discount (P/B < 1.0x), but its primary risk is stagnation in slow-growing markets. For an investor prioritizing total return over income, FVCB's growth engine makes it the more compelling long-term investment.

  • Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.

    BRBS • NYSE AMERICAN

    Blue Ridge Bankshares (BRBS) and C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) are both community banks operating in Virginia, but they represent starkly different risk and operational profiles. CFFI is the model of a traditional, conservative bank with a clean track record and stable profitability. BRBS, on the other hand, has pursued an aggressive growth strategy, including ventures into fintech partnerships, which has resulted in significant regulatory scrutiny, operational challenges, and substantial financial losses. This makes the comparison one of stability and predictability (CFFI) versus high-risk turnaround potential (BRBS).

    CFFI's business and moat are built on a century of traditional community banking, with a strong brand in its core markets and a loyal customer base, reflected in its stable deposit franchise. BRBS attempted to build a modern moat through its fintech division, aiming for network effects and a national reach, but this strategy backfired, leading to regulatory enforcement actions (Formal Agreement with OCC in 2022). This has severely damaged its brand and operational stability. On scale, both have assets in the $2-3 billion range. CFFI's moat, while traditional, is currently far more effective and less risky than BRBS's broken model. Winner: C&F Financial Corporation by a wide margin due to its stable, proven business model and lack of major regulatory issues.

    An analysis of their financial statements reveals CFFI's clear superiority. CFFI consistently generates profits, with a positive Return on Assets (ROA) of around 0.80% and a Return on Equity (ROE) near 10%. BRBS, in contrast, has reported significant net losses recently, leading to negative ROA and ROE as it works through credit issues and regulatory costs. CFFI's Net Interest Margin (NIM) is stable around 3.25%, while BRBS's has been volatile. CFFI maintains a strong balance sheet with high capital ratios (CET1 > 12%), whereas BRBS has been working to rebuild its capital position to satisfy regulators. CFFI also pays a reliable dividend, which BRBS suspended. Winner: C&F Financial Corporation on every key financial metric.

    Past performance further highlights the divergence. Over the past five years, CFFI has delivered steady, albeit slow, EPS growth and a stable dividend, leading to modest but positive total shareholder returns. BRBS's stock has suffered a catastrophic decline, with its TSR being deeply negative over 1, 3, and 5-year periods. The stock has experienced a maximum drawdown exceeding 80% from its peak. CFFI's stock has been a low-volatility performer (Beta < 0.8), while BRBS has been exceptionally volatile due to its fundamental problems. CFFI wins on growth (as BRBS's is negative), margins, TSR, and risk. Winner: C&F Financial Corporation, as it has successfully preserved and grown shareholder value while BRBS has destroyed it.

    Looking at future growth, CFFI's prospects are tied to the slow and steady economic development of its Virginia markets. Its growth will likely be in the low single digits, driven by organic loan origination. BRBS's future is entirely dependent on its ability to resolve its regulatory issues, clean up its loan portfolio, and successfully execute a turnaround plan. Any 'growth' in the near term will be recovery from a low base. The uncertainty and execution risk are immense, making its future prospects speculative at best. CFFI's path, while unexciting, is far more predictable and secure. Winner: C&F Financial Corporation due to its clear and low-risk growth path.

    In terms of valuation, BRBS trades at a deeply depressed Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio, often well below 0.5x. This signifies significant market distress and a lack of confidence in the stated book value, which could be subject to further writedowns. CFFI trades at a healthier, yet still attractive, P/B of around 0.8x. While BRBS is 'cheaper' on paper, it is a classic value trap—the low price reflects extreme fundamental risk. CFFI's valuation offers a discount to book value without the associated existential risks. CFFI's dividend yield of ~4.0% provides a tangible return, which BRBS lacks. Winner: C&F Financial Corporation, as its valuation represents fair value, not financial distress.

    Winner: C&F Financial Corporation over Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. This is an unequivocal victory for CFFI, which stands as a stable, profitable, and well-managed community bank against a competitor facing severe operational and regulatory challenges. CFFI's key strengths are its consistent profitability (ROE ~10%), strong balance sheet, and reliable dividend. Its primary weakness is a lack of exciting growth. BRBS's only potential 'strength' is the speculative, high-risk potential for a turnaround from a deeply depressed valuation (P/B < 0.5x), but its weaknesses are overwhelming: regulatory sanctions, net losses, and a broken growth strategy. For any prudent investor, CFFI is the demonstrably superior choice.

  • Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation

    AUB • NASDAQ GLOBAL SELECT

    Comparing C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) to Atlantic Union Bankshares (AUB) is a study in scale and strategy within the Virginia banking sector. AUB is a much larger and more dominant regional player, with a market capitalization and asset base that dwarfs CFFI. It offers a broader range of services and has a more aggressive growth-by-acquisition history. CFFI is a traditional community bank focused on organic growth in smaller markets. Consequently, AUB offers investors exposure to a market-leading franchise with greater resources, while CFFI provides a more localized, small-cap banking investment.

    Regarding business and moat, AUB's scale is its primary advantage. With total assets exceeding $20 billion, it benefits from significant economies of scale in technology, marketing, and compliance that CFFI, with assets around $2.5 billion, cannot match. AUB has a powerful brand across Virginia and neighboring states, with a Top 5 deposit market share in Virginia. CFFI's brand is strong but confined to its specific local communities. Both have high switching costs and regulatory barriers, but AUB's scale and market leadership give it a wider and deeper moat. Winner: Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation due to its commanding market position and scale advantages.

    From a financial statement perspective, AUB's larger asset base allows it to generate far greater net income, though its profitability ratios are often comparable or slightly lower than CFFI's. For example, CFFI often achieves a higher Return on Equity (ROE > 10%) than AUB (ROE ~8-9%), indicating CFFI uses its smaller capital base more efficiently. AUB, however, operates with a better efficiency ratio (typically in the mid-50% range versus CFFI's ~70%), a direct benefit of its scale. Both maintain strong capital and liquidity positions. AUB's revenue growth is often more robust due to its ability to make strategic acquisitions. While CFFI is more efficient on a return basis, AUB's superior efficiency and growth profile give it an edge. Winner: Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation due to its better cost structure and growth capabilities.

    Historically, AUB has demonstrated stronger growth in both revenue and earnings, driven by a combination of organic expansion and M&A activity. Its 5-year EPS CAGR has generally been higher than CFFI's. In terms of total shareholder return (TSR), AUB has delivered solid performance, though it is more correlated with the broader regional banking indices. CFFI's performance has been steadier but less spectacular, with lower volatility (Beta < 0.8). AUB wins on growth and absolute returns, while CFFI offers a more stable, lower-risk profile. For a performance-oriented investor, AUB's track record is more compelling. Winner: Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation for its superior historical growth and shareholder returns.

    Looking ahead, AUB is better positioned to drive future growth. Its scale allows for continued investment in digital platforms and potential acquisitions to consolidate its market share. The bank has a larger and more diversified loan portfolio, enabling it to capitalize on various economic trends across the Mid-Atlantic. CFFI's growth is more limited by the economic prospects of its smaller communities. AUB's management provides more detailed forward-looking guidance, signaling a clear strategy for expansion and efficiency gains. While AUB faces the challenge of integrating large acquisitions, its growth runway is substantially longer. Winner: Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation due to its multiple levers for future growth.

    From a valuation standpoint, CFFI often appears cheaper on a Price-to-Book (P/B) basis, frequently trading below 1.0x. AUB typically trades at a higher P/B multiple, often 1.1x or more, reflecting its market leadership and stronger growth prospects. However, AUB's Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio can sometimes be lower than CFFI's, depending on recent earnings performance. Both offer competitive dividend yields, though CFFI's is often slightly higher (~4.0% vs. AUB's ~3.8%). AUB's premium P/B is justified by its higher quality, scale, and better growth outlook, making it arguably better value on a quality-adjusted basis. Winner: Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation, as its premium valuation is supported by superior fundamentals.

    Winner: Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation over C&F Financial Corporation. AUB is the stronger overall company due to its dominant market position, benefits of scale, and more robust growth prospects. Its key strengths include a leading deposit share in Virginia, a more efficient cost structure (Efficiency Ratio ~55%), and a proven track record of successful acquisitions. Its primary risk is the complexity of managing a large organization and the execution risk associated with M&A. CFFI is a well-run community bank with higher capital efficiency (ROE > 10%) and a more attractive valuation (P/B < 1.0x), but its small scale and limited growth potential make it a less compelling investment compared to the regional leader. This makes AUB the better choice for most investors seeking exposure to Virginia banking.

  • TowneBank

    TOWN • NASDAQ GLOBAL SELECT

    TowneBank (TOWN) and C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) represent different tiers of the banking industry in Virginia. Like Atlantic Union, TowneBank is a large, high-performing regional bank with a significant market presence, while CFFI is a much smaller community bank. TowneBank has built its franchise on a unique high-touch, board-driven model targeting affluent clients and businesses, resulting in exceptional growth and profitability. CFFI follows a more traditional community banking path. The comparison highlights the advantages of a specialized, service-oriented model at scale versus a conventional, smaller-scale operation.

    TowneBank's business and moat are formidable. Its unique model involves creating local advisory boards of business leaders who drive client acquisition, creating powerful network effects and deep community integration. This has resulted in a Top 3 deposit market share in its core Hampton Roads, VA market. Its brand is synonymous with premium service. CFFI has a solid local brand but lacks this distinctive, self-reinforcing business model. On scale, TowneBank is much larger, with assets over $15 billion compared to CFFI's $2.5 billion. This scale provides significant operational advantages. Winner: TowneBank, due to its unique and highly effective relationship-based moat and superior scale.

    Financially, TowneBank consistently delivers strong results. It has shown robust revenue growth from both its banking and non-banking segments (like insurance and real estate services), a diversification CFFI lacks. TowneBank's profitability is excellent, with a Return on Assets (ROA) often exceeding 1.0%, a key benchmark of quality for banks, which is superior to CFFI's ~0.8%. Its efficiency ratio is also typically better than CFFI's. While CFFI's Return on Equity can be strong (~10%), TowneBank often matches or exceeds this while being a much larger and more diversified entity. Both have solid balance sheets, but TowneBank's financial engine is demonstrably more powerful. Winner: TowneBank for its superior profitability, diversification, and growth.

    In terms of past performance, TowneBank has been an exceptional growth story for decades. Its 5- and 10-year growth rates for revenue, earnings, and dividends have consistently outpaced CFFI and most peers. This fundamental outperformance has translated into strong long-term total shareholder returns (TSR), although its stock can be more volatile than CFFI's due to its higher valuation and growth expectations. CFFI's performance has been stable and predictable, but its growth has been minimal in comparison. For long-term wealth creation, TowneBank's track record is in a different league. Winner: TowneBank, based on its outstanding historical growth across all key metrics.

    Looking to the future, TowneBank continues to have a clear path for growth. It is steadily expanding its footprint into new, attractive markets like Charlotte, NC, and has a proven model for entering and winning share in these new areas. Its diversified fee-income streams provide a buffer against fluctuations in interest rates, a risk that CFFI is more exposed to. CFFI's future growth is limited to the low-single-digit prospects of its existing markets. TowneBank's strategic initiatives and expansion plans point to a much brighter growth outlook. Winner: TowneBank, due to its proven expansion strategy and diversified revenue streams.

    Valuation is the one area where CFFI might look more appealing at first glance. CFFI usually trades at a significant discount to its book value (P/B ~0.8x). TowneBank, as a premium franchise, almost always trades at a high P/B multiple, often 1.3x or higher. This premium reflects its superior profitability (higher ROA and ROE) and growth prospects. While CFFI's dividend yield might be slightly higher, TowneBank has a long history of dividend growth. In this case, paying a premium for TowneBank's quality is justified. It is a 'growth at a reasonable price' stock, whereas CFFI is a 'value' stock with limited catalysts. Winner: TowneBank, as its valuation premium is warranted by its superior quality and growth.

    Winner: TowneBank over C&F Financial Corporation. TowneBank is a superior banking franchise in almost every respect. Its key strengths are its unique, relationship-driven business model, exceptional long-term growth track record, and diversified, profitable operations (ROA > 1.0%). Its primary risk is the high valuation it commands, which requires flawless execution to be sustained. CFFI is a solid, traditional bank, and its strengths are its low valuation (P/B < 1.0x) and stable dividend. However, it cannot compete with TowneBank's dynamic growth engine and powerful competitive moat. For an investor seeking quality and growth in the regional banking space, TowneBank is the clear and compelling winner.

  • Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.

    BHRB • NASDAQ CAPITAL MARKET

    Burke & Herbert (BHRB) offers an interesting comparison to C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) as both are long-established Virginia banks, but with different scales and strategic priorities. BHRB, known as Virginia's oldest bank, recently converted from a private entity to a public company, bringing new strategic options into play. It is slightly larger than CFFI and is concentrated in the attractive Northern Virginia market. The comparison centers on whether BHRB's newfound public status and prime market location can translate into better performance than CFFI's steady, multi-regional approach.

    BHRB's business and moat are rooted in its incredible history and brand recognition, being founded in 1852. This legacy provides a powerful brand in its Northern Virginia stronghold. Its moat is built on generations of trust and customer relationships. CFFI also has a long history (founded in 1927) but its brand is spread across more disparate markets. In terms of scale, BHRB is larger, with assets around $3.5 billion versus CFFI's $2.5 billion. BHRB's concentration in the wealthy Northern Virginia market is a key advantage. While both have strong traditional moats, BHRB's brand legacy and superior market focus give it an edge. Winner: Burke & Herbert for its stronger brand cachet and strategic market concentration.

    Financially, BHRB has demonstrated strong profitability metrics. Its Return on Assets (ROA) is often above 1.0%, and its Return on Equity (ROE) has been in the low double-digits, both of which are generally superior to CFFI's 0.8% ROA and ~10% ROE. However, as a newly public company, its financial reporting history is less extensive. CFFI has a longer track record of consistent public financial performance. BHRB has also historically operated with a very high efficiency ratio, a point of focus for improvement post-IPO. CFFI's cost structure is more predictable. Despite the efficiency issue, BHRB's core profitability is stronger. Winner: Burke & Herbert based on its superior ROA and ROE.

    Evaluating past performance is complex for BHRB due to its recent transition to a publicly-traded company in 2023. We cannot analyze long-term total shareholder returns. Based on its pre-public financials, it has a history of steady earnings growth. CFFI has a long, documented history of slow but stable EPS growth and consistent dividend payments, making its past performance transparent and reliable for investors. BHRB's stock performance since its IPO has been volatile as the market digests its strategy. Due to its long and stable public track record, CFFI is the winner in this category. Winner: C&F Financial Corporation because of its proven and transparent long-term performance as a public entity.

    Future growth prospects appear brighter for BHRB. Its presence in the dynamic and affluent Northern Virginia market provides a fertile ground for loan growth and wealth management services. As a newly public company, BHRB has access to capital markets to fund expansion and M&A in a way it previously did not. Management is focused on improving its efficiency ratio, which could provide a significant boost to earnings. CFFI's growth is tied to its more mature, slower-growing markets. The combination of market tailwinds and post-IPO strategic initiatives gives BHRB a distinct advantage. Winner: Burke & Herbert due to its superior market location and strategic flexibility as a new public company.

    From a valuation perspective, both banks often trade at a discount to book value. BHRB's Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio has hovered around 0.8x-0.9x since its debut, similar to CFFI's typical valuation. However, given BHRB's higher profitability (ROA > 1.0%), its discount to book value appears more compelling. It signifies that you are buying a more profitable bank for a similar price relative to its assets. Both offer attractive dividend yields, but BHRB's potential for earnings improvement could lead to faster dividend growth. On a risk-adjusted basis, BHRB's valuation looks more attractive. Winner: Burke & Herbert for offering higher profitability at a comparable valuation multiple.

    Winner: Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. over C&F Financial Corporation. BHRB emerges as the stronger investment opportunity due to its superior profitability, prime market location, and untapped potential as a newly public company. Its key strengths are its exceptional brand legacy, higher ROA (>1.0%), and strategic position in the wealthy Northern Virginia market. Its primary risks are the execution challenges of improving efficiency and navigating the public markets. CFFI is a solid, low-risk bank, but its strengths in stability and a long public history are overshadowed by BHRB's more compelling combination of quality, value, and growth potential. The ability to buy a more profitable, better-positioned bank at a similar discount to book value makes BHRB the logical choice.

Top Similar Companies

Based on industry classification and performance score:

OFG Bancorp

OFG • NYSE
23/25

Amalgamated Financial Corp.

AMAL • NASDAQ
22/25

JB Financial Group Co., Ltd.

175330 • KOSPI
21/25

Detailed Analysis

Does C&F Financial Corporation Have a Strong Business Model and Competitive Moat?

4/5

C&F Financial Corporation operates a unique, three-pronged business model combining traditional community banking, a national mortgage business, and a specialized consumer finance division. Its primary strength lies in the stable, low-cost deposit base from its community bank, which funds higher-yielding, though riskier, non-prime auto loans. While this diversification provides multiple revenue streams, the company's reliance on interest income is high, with below-average fee income from more stable sources. The investment takeaway is mixed; the model offers higher potential returns through its niche lending but also carries elevated risk from its cyclical mortgage and consumer finance segments.

  • Fee Income Balance

    Fail

    The company's reliance on net interest income is high, with the volatile mortgage banking segment providing most of its fee-based revenue, indicating a weakness in diversified, recurring non-interest income.

    A strong mix of non-interest (fee) income can insulate a bank from the pressures of narrowing interest rate spreads. C&F's primary source of non-interest income is its mortgage banking segment, which generated $12.12 million. This represents just under 10% of total revenues ($127.31 million). This level of fee income is below the typical regional bank average, which often stands in the 20-25% range. Furthermore, mortgage banking income is highly cyclical and unreliable, fluctuating with interest rates and the housing market. The bank lacks significant revenue from more stable fee sources like wealth management or treasury services. This heavy dependence on net interest income from its lending operations is a strategic weakness, making its earnings more vulnerable to interest rate cycles. Therefore, this factor receives a 'Fail'.

  • Deposit Customer Mix

    Pass

    By focusing on local individuals and small businesses, C&F maintains a granular and diversified deposit base, reducing the risk associated with reliance on a few large depositors.

    Community banks like C&F typically have a well-diversified deposit base by nature, comprising thousands of small accounts from local residents and businesses. This contrasts with some larger banks that may have significant concentration risk from a few large corporate or institutional clients. A granular deposit mix provides a more stable and predictable funding source, as the withdrawal decisions of many small depositors tend to offset one another. This reduces the bank's vulnerability to a liquidity crisis if one or two large clients decide to move their funds. Given its operational focus on serving the general public and small to medium-sized enterprises in its Virginia footprint, C&F's deposit customer base is inherently diversified. This structure is a key strength that mitigates funding risk and supports a 'Pass' for this factor.

  • Niche Lending Focus

    Pass

    C&F's consumer finance division, which specializes in non-prime auto lending, represents a distinct and profitable niche that sets it apart from typical community banks and boosts overall returns.

    While many community banks focus solely on traditional commercial and real estate lending, C&F has built a specialized and significant franchise in non-prime auto lending through its C&F Finance subsidiary. This segment contributed $27.05 million, or 21%, of total revenue. This niche allows the company to generate significantly higher yields than it could from conventional loans, boosting its net interest margin and overall profitability. Success in this area requires specialized underwriting expertise to manage the higher credit risk involved. This proven ability to operate profitably in a specialized, higher-margin segment is a key competitive differentiator and a powerful engine for returns. This strong niche focus is a clear strength that justifies a 'Pass'.

  • Local Deposit Stickiness

    Pass

    The bank's community-focused model inherently cultivates a loyal and low-cost deposit base, which is crucial for funding its lending operations, particularly its higher-yield consumer loans.

    The fundamental moat of a community bank is its ability to attract and retain low-cost, stable deposits. These "sticky" deposits, often from long-term local customers and small businesses, are less likely to flee during market volatility and are less sensitive to interest rate changes. While specific figures on noninterest-bearing deposits are not provided, C&F's entire business model relies on this strength. The low-cost funding gathered by the community bank is what enables the consumer finance division to be profitable by lending at higher rates to non-prime borrowers. This funding advantage is superior to what non-bank lenders or money-center banks typically have, as their funding sources are often more expensive and market-sensitive. The stability of its core deposit franchise is the most critical factor supporting its overall business, warranting a 'Pass'.

  • Branch Network Advantage

    Pass

    C&F's established branch network in its core Virginia markets provides a physical presence that anchors its community-focused strategy, supporting stable deposit gathering.

    As a community-focused institution, C&F Financial's strength is derived from its deep roots in its operating regions of eastern and central Virginia. While specific metrics like deposits per branch are not available, the Community Banking segment's position as the primary revenue driver ($89.28 million, or 70% of total revenue) strongly suggests a successful and well-entrenched local presence. This physical network is key to its relationship-based model, attracting and retaining local retail and small business customers who prefer in-person service. This advantage translates into a stable, low-cost deposit base, which is the lifeblood of any bank. Compared to larger national competitors, whose models are often less personal, C&F's local scale is a distinct competitive advantage in its target markets. The business model's success is predicated on this advantage, justifying a 'Pass' despite the lack of specific branch efficiency data.

How Strong Are C&F Financial Corporation's Financial Statements?

4/5

C&F Financial Corporation shows strong profitability and a safe balance sheet, with recent net income hitting $7.08 million in Q3 2025. The bank maintains a healthy loan-to-deposit ratio of 85.7% and a very sustainable dividend payout ratio of 22.74%. However, its operating cash flow has been volatile, swinging from -$4.39 million in Q2 to $23.44 million in Q3, raising questions about consistency. The bank is also setting aside more money for potential loan losses. The investor takeaway is mixed-to-positive; the core business is profitable, but inconsistent cash generation and rising credit provisions are key risks to monitor.

  • Capital and Liquidity Strength

    Pass

    The bank maintains a strong capital and liquidity position, with a healthy tangible equity ratio and a conservative loan-to-deposit ratio that provides a solid buffer against financial stress.

    C&F Financial's capital and liquidity buffers are robust, positioning it well to absorb potential shocks. While specific regulatory ratios like CET1 are not provided, the Tangible Common Equity to Total Assets ratio is a solid 8.38% as of Q3 2025. This level of tangible equity provides a strong loss-absorbing cushion. Liquidity is also a clear strength, anchored by a loans-to-deposits ratio of 85.7%. This indicates the bank is soundly funding its lending activities with stable customer deposits rather than more volatile wholesale funding. With $2.3 billion in deposits forming the foundation of its $2.71 billion balance sheet, the bank's liquidity profile is conservative and resilient.

  • Credit Loss Readiness

    Fail

    The bank is increasing its provision for credit losses, signaling potential concerns about future loan performance, which presents a risk to future earnings despite having a reasonable reserve level currently.

    The bank's readiness for credit losses presents a mixed picture and a notable risk. On the positive side, its allowance for credit losses stands at $39.45 million, which is 1.96% of its gross loan portfolio of $2.01 billion. This reserve level appears reasonable for a community bank. However, a significant red flag is the rising provision for these losses, which climbed from $2.1 million in Q2 to $2.9 million in Q3 2025. This trend suggests that management anticipates a tougher economic environment and potential deterioration in borrower credit quality. While proactively building reserves is prudent, the increasing provisions directly reduce pre-tax income and signal that credit headwinds could impact future profitability. Given this clear trend, the factor is marked as a fail to highlight the risk to investors.

  • Interest Rate Sensitivity

    Pass

    The bank's core net interest income continues to grow despite rising interest expenses, suggesting it is effectively managing the spread between its assets and liabilities in the current rate environment.

    C&F Financial appears to be managing its sensitivity to interest rate changes effectively, though key data points like the duration of its securities portfolio and unrealized losses (AOCI) are not available for a full analysis. The primary evidence of successful management is the continued growth in Net Interest Income (NII), which rose 10.06% year-over-year to $27.17 million in Q3 2025. This was achieved even as interest paid on deposits increased to $9.95 million. This performance indicates that the bank is successfully repricing its loans and investments at a faster pace than its funding costs are rising, protecting its core profitability. While risks associated with its $449 million investment portfolio exist, the strong NII performance provides confidence in its overall asset-liability strategy.

  • Net Interest Margin Quality

    Pass

    The bank's net interest income is growing at a healthy pace, showing that it is successfully managing its lending and funding spreads to boost core profitability.

    The quality of the bank's net interest income is a core strength. While a precise Net Interest Margin (NIM) percentage is unavailable, the trend in Net Interest Income (NII) is decidedly positive. NII grew by 10.06% year-over-year in Q3 2025 and also increased sequentially from the prior quarter to $27.17 million. This growth is particularly impressive because it comes at a time when funding costs are rising across the industry, as seen by the bank's higher interest expense on deposits. The ability to grow NII in this environment shows strong pricing power on its loan portfolio and an effective strategy for managing its overall interest rate spread, which is the primary driver of earnings for a community bank.

  • Efficiency Ratio Discipline

    Pass

    The bank has demonstrated excellent cost control, with its efficiency ratio improving consistently and falling to a healthy `67.45%` in the most recent quarter.

    C&F Financial exhibits strong discipline in managing its expenses. Its efficiency ratio—a key measure of what it costs to generate a dollar of revenue—has shown marked improvement, declining from 70.68% for the full year 2024 to 67.45% in Q3 2025. A lower ratio is better, and this positive trend indicates that revenue is growing faster than expenses. Noninterest expenses have remained stable, hovering around $24.5 million per quarter, even as the bank's revenue base has expanded. This disciplined approach to cost control directly supports profitability and demonstrates effective operational management, which is a significant strength.

How Has C&F Financial Corporation Performed Historically?

3/5

C&F Financial Corporation's past performance is a mixed bag for investors. The bank demonstrates clear strength in growing its core business, with gross loans and total deposits increasing by 9.1% and 5.5% annually over the last five years, respectively. It has also been very shareholder-friendly, consistently raising dividends and buying back over 12% of its shares. However, this has been overshadowed by a significant decline in profitability since 2022, with net income falling by over 30% and Return on Equity dropping from 14.4% to 9.0%. This suggests that while the bank is growing its customer base, it has struggled with margin pressures in the recent interest rate environment. The takeaway for investors is mixed, weighing strong balance sheet growth and capital returns against deteriorating earnings.

  • Loans and Deposits History

    Pass

    The bank has demonstrated strong and consistent historical growth in its core business, with both loans and deposits expanding steadily over the last five years.

    C&F Financial's past performance is anchored by healthy and consistent growth in its core balance sheet. Gross loans have expanded at a compound annual rate of 9.1% over the last five years, climbing from $1.36 billion in FY2020 to $1.92 billion in FY2024. This lending growth has been funded by a solid 5.5% annual growth in total deposits over the same period, reaching $2.17 billion. This steady expansion indicates the bank is successfully competing and gaining share in its local markets. The loan-to-deposit ratio has moved from 77% to a still-prudent 88%, showing that management is effectively deploying its funding base to generate interest income.

  • NIM and Efficiency Trends

    Fail

    The bank's profitability has been squeezed by a declining Net Interest Margin (NIM) in the latest year, while non-interest expenses have remained stubbornly high, indicating pressure on both revenue and cost control.

    The bank's historical performance shows clear signs of margin and efficiency pressure. Net Interest Income (NII), the bank's core revenue, stalled and slightly declined to $96.78 million in FY2024 despite a larger asset base. This was driven by a dramatic rise in interest expense on deposits, which grew more than seven-fold in two years, from $5.2 million to $38.1 million, indicating significant Net Interest Margin (NIM) compression. Concurrently, non-interest expenses have been difficult to control, remaining elevated around $90 million for the last two years. This combination of flat revenue and high costs points to a deteriorating efficiency profile, which has directly contributed to weaker returns on equity.

  • EPS Growth Track

    Fail

    The company's earnings per share (EPS) track record is weak, as strong growth through 2022 was completely reversed by a sharp decline in the last two years.

    C&F Financial's earnings performance has been highly inconsistent. After showing impressive growth that pushed EPS to a peak of $8.29 in FY2022, it fell sharply for two consecutive years, landing at $6.01 in FY2024, a 27% drop from its high. This decline, driven by lower net income, resulted in a negative three-year EPS compound annual growth rate of approximately -15%. Even though the company's share buyback program provided support, it was not enough to overcome the significant deterioration in underlying business profitability. This volatility and recent negative trend make for a poor historical earnings record.

  • Credit Metrics Stability

    Pass

    The bank has significantly increased its provisions for credit losses recently, which has hurt earnings but appears to be a proactive measure to maintain a healthy balance sheet against future risks.

    The company's credit management appears prudent, though it has come at the cost of recent earnings. The provision for loan losses, which is money set aside to cover potential bad loans, surged from just $0.58 million in FY2021 to $13.25 million in FY2024. While this large increase was a primary driver of the bank's lower net income, it also built up the bank's reserves. The allowance for loan losses now stands at $40.1 million, or about 2.1% of gross loans, a solid cushion against potential defaults. This proactive provisioning, while painful for short-term profits, suggests that management is staying ahead of credit risk rather than reacting to it, which is a sign of disciplined underwriting.

  • Dividends and Buybacks Record

    Pass

    The company has an excellent track record of returning capital through consistently rising dividends and significant share buybacks, which have reduced the share count by over 12% in five years.

    C&F Financial has a strong and consistent history of rewarding its shareholders. The dividend per share has grown steadily from $1.52 in FY2020 to $1.76 in FY2024, demonstrating a clear commitment to providing income. This dividend is well-supported by earnings, with the payout ratio remaining conservative at 29.1% in the most recent fiscal year. Beyond dividends, the company has aggressively repurchased its own stock, reducing shares outstanding from 3.68 million to 3.24 million over the last five years. The combination of a growing, sustainable dividend and a shrinking share count is a powerful and positive signal for investors.

What Are C&F Financial Corporation's Future Growth Prospects?

1/5

C&F Financial Corporation's future growth outlook is mixed, presenting a high-risk, high-reward profile. The company's primary tailwind is its profitable non-prime auto lending business, which offers higher yields than traditional banking. However, significant headwinds include a heavy reliance on interest income, exposure to cyclical mortgage and auto markets, and intense competition from larger, more technologically advanced banks. While its diversified model is unique, its growth is more volatile and economically sensitive than that of a typical community bank. The investor takeaway is cautious; potential for outsized returns exists, but it is accompanied by elevated risks tied to credit quality and interest rate fluctuations.

  • Loan Growth Outlook

    Fail

    The loan growth outlook is uncertain, relying on a slow-growing community banking portfolio and a higher-risk consumer finance segment, with no clear guidance suggesting strong near-term expansion.

    C&F's loan growth prospects are a tale of two different stories. The core community banking portfolio is likely to grow slowly, in line with the modest economic expansion expected in its Virginia markets. The consumer finance segment offers higher growth potential but comes with significantly greater credit risk, especially in an economic downturn. The company does not provide explicit loan growth guidance or detailed pipeline metrics, making it difficult to assess near-term demand. Given the macroeconomic headwinds and the bank's niche exposures, the overall outlook for robust, high-quality loan growth is weak. The lack of a strong, conventional loan growth engine is a key concern for future earnings.

  • Capital and M&A Plans

    Fail

    As a smaller institution, the company lacks a defined M&A strategy for growth and has been conservative with capital deployment, suggesting future growth will be limited to slower, organic means.

    For many community banks, disciplined M&A is a primary driver of growth in a slow-growing market. C&F Financial has not recently engaged in or announced any significant acquisitions that would expand its asset base or geographic reach. Furthermore, information regarding its capital targets or substantial buyback programs is not prominently disclosed. This conservative approach to capital deployment means the bank is relying almost entirely on organic growth within its existing business lines. While this approach can be prudent, it also limits the potential for earnings per share accretion and expansion that competitors may achieve through strategic acquisitions. This passive stance on M&A and capital deployment points to a more limited growth profile ahead.

  • Branch and Digital Plans

    Fail

    The company has not announced clear plans for branch optimization or digital enhancement, lagging industry trends and creating a risk of losing customers to more technologically advanced competitors.

    C&F Financial operates a traditional community bank model where a physical branch network is important for its relationship-based strategy. However, the banking industry is rapidly shifting towards digital channels, and successful banks are actively consolidating costly branches while investing in mobile and online capabilities. There is no publicly available information on C&F's specific targets for branch closures, openings, or digital user growth. This lack of a clearly articulated strategy for optimizing its physical and digital footprint is a significant weakness. Without ongoing investment and modernization, the bank risks appearing outdated and could lose younger customers and small businesses who prioritize digital convenience, potentially leading to deposit erosion over the long term.

  • NIM Outlook and Repricing

    Pass

    The bank's high-yielding consumer finance portfolio provides a structural advantage to its net interest margin (NIM), offering a buffer against the rising deposit costs affecting the entire industry.

    While C&F Financial, like all banks, faces pressure from rising deposit costs, its unique business mix provides a partial offset. The consumer finance segment, which purchases high-yield non-prime auto loans, significantly boosts the company's overall asset yield. This allows the bank to maintain a healthier net interest margin (NIM) than a traditional community bank with a portfolio consisting solely of lower-yielding commercial and mortgage loans. Although the company does not provide specific NIM guidance, this structural advantage in its loan portfolio is a key strength. It provides a cushion against margin compression and supports profitability, justifying a 'Pass' for this factor despite the challenging rate environment.

  • Fee Income Growth Drivers

    Fail

    The company has a low proportion of fee income that is heavily concentrated in the volatile mortgage banking segment, with no clear strategy to build more stable, recurring revenue streams.

    A key weakness for C&F is its high dependence on net interest income. Its fee-generating business is dominated by the mortgage banking segment ($12.12 million), which is notoriously cyclical and sensitive to interest rates. This resulted in fee income being less than 10% of total revenue, well below peers who often target 20-25%. The company has not announced specific growth targets or initiatives to expand more stable fee income sources like wealth management, treasury services, or card interchange fees. This lack of diversification makes earnings highly vulnerable to compression in net interest margins and downturns in the housing market, representing a significant structural weakness for future growth.

Is C&F Financial Corporation Fairly Valued?

3/5

As of January 9, 2026, C&F Financial Corporation appears to be fairly valued with potential for modest upside. The company's valuation is supported by a low Price-to-Earnings ratio of approximately 8.6x and a Price-to-Book ratio near 1.0x. The 2.6% dividend yield is attractive and well-supported, but this is balanced by concerns over flat earnings growth and poor operational efficiency. The investor takeaway is neutral to slightly positive; the stock is not a deep bargain, but its current price reflects a reasonable entry point given its tangible assets and shareholder returns.

  • Price to Tangible Book

    Pass

    The stock trades at a Price to Tangible Book Value multiple of approximately 1.0x, indicating that investors are not paying a premium for the bank's net tangible assets.

    For banks, the Price to Tangible Book Value (P/TBV) is a primary valuation metric. CFFI's P/TBV ratio is 1.0x, and its P/B ratio is slightly lower at 0.9x. This means the stock is priced almost exactly at the tangible net worth of the company. A P/TBV around or below 1.0x is often considered a sign of fair value or potential undervaluation. This is especially relevant when paired with a positive Return on Tangible Common Equity (ROTCE). While CFFI's ROE of 10.92% is not exceptional, it is solid enough to suggest the bank is creating value from its asset base. Therefore, paying 1.0x tangible book for a profitable franchise is a reasonable proposition.

  • ROE to P/B Alignment

    Fail

    The company's modest Return on Equity does not justify a P/B multiple significantly above 1.0x, indicating the stock is fairly priced on this basis but not compellingly undervalued.

    A bank's ability to generate returns on its equity should be reflected in its Price-to-Book (P/B) multiple. CFFI reported a Return on Equity (ROE) of 10.92%. In a stable interest rate environment, a bank should generally trade at a P/B multiple that is roughly aligned with its ROE divided by the cost of equity (e.g., if cost of equity is 10%, a 10% ROE bank should trade around 1.0x P/B). CFFI's P/B ratio of 0.9x - 1.0x seems to be in alignment with its 10.92% ROE. However, high-performing banks often generate ROEs of 12-15% or more, earning them higher P/B multiples. Since CFFI's ROE is merely adequate and not superior, its P/B multiple is also just adequate. This alignment suggests fair pricing but fails to signal a clear mispricing opportunity.

  • P/E and Growth Check

    Fail

    The stock's low P/E ratio is justified by a track record of volatile, flat-to-negative earnings growth, offering no clear signal of undervaluation on a growth-adjusted basis.

    CFFI trades at a low TTM P/E ratio of ~8.6x, which on the surface appears cheap compared to the broader market. However, valuation must be considered alongside growth. Prior analysis revealed that EPS has been stagnant over the last five years, ending FY2024 at $6.01 compared to $6.06 in FY2020. The future growth outlook was also deemed weak due to a lack of M&A and efficiency initiatives. With no significant near-term EPS growth expected, the PEG ratio (P/E to growth) is unfavorable. A low P/E is appropriate for a company with minimal growth, making this a valuation trap rather than a clear opportunity.

  • Income and Buyback Yield

    Pass

    The company provides a solid and sustainable shareholder return through a growing dividend and consistent share repurchases.

    C&F Financial offers an attractive forward dividend yield of 2.63%. This dividend is well-protected, with a low payout ratio of just 22.7%, meaning earnings cover the payment more than four times over. Furthermore, the company actively returns capital via buybacks, having reduced its share count by 3.01% in the last year. The combination of dividends and buybacks results in a shareholder yield exceeding 5.5%, which is a strong, tangible return for investors and provides downside support for the stock. This commitment to capital returns is a clear strength.

  • Relative Valuation Snapshot

    Pass

    The stock trades at a significant P/E discount to its peers, which appears to adequately compensate for its lower growth and efficiency profile, suggesting a fair relative valuation.

    When compared to regional peers like Atlantic Union Bankshares (AUB), CFFI appears cheap. CFFI's P/E ratio of ~8.6x is substantially lower than AUB's multiple of over 20x. This steep discount reflects the market's awareness of CFFI's weaknesses, namely its inefficient operations and lack of scale. However, the magnitude of the discount seems appropriate, if not slightly excessive. An investor is paying a much lower price for each dollar of CFFI's earnings, which compensates for the higher risk and lower growth prospects. While its dividend yield of ~2.6% is lower than AUB's, its valuation discount on an earnings basis is more pronounced, making its relative valuation attractive.

Detailed Future Risks

The primary risk for C&F Financial stems from the macroeconomic environment, specifically interest rate volatility and the potential for an economic slowdown. Like most regional banks, its profitability is heavily dependent on its net interest margin (NIM)—the difference between the interest it earns on loans and what it pays for deposits. In a 'higher for longer' rate scenario, the bank's funding costs could continue to rise as depositors demand higher yields, potentially compressing its NIM and hurting earnings. More critically, an economic recession would directly threaten the quality of its loan portfolio. A downturn could lead to an increase in non-performing loans, forcing the bank to set aside more capital for potential losses and reducing its profitability. The bank's exposure to commercial real estate and its consumer finance subsidiary, which specializes in automobile loans, are particularly vulnerable areas during periods of high unemployment or economic stress.

Beyond macroeconomic pressures, C&F Financial operates in a fiercely competitive industry. It contends with the immense scale, marketing budgets, and technological advantages of large national banks that can offer a wider array of services and more sophisticated digital platforms. Simultaneously, the rise of financial technology (fintech) companies presents a structural threat, as these nimble competitors are capturing market share in lucrative areas like payments, personal loans, and wealth management with user-friendly applications and lower overhead costs. As a smaller community bank, C&F Financial must continually invest in technology to meet evolving customer expectations, but it faces a difficult balancing act. Over-investing could strain its expense ratio, while under-investing risks losing customers, especially younger demographics, to more tech-savvy rivals.

Company-specific and regulatory risks also warrant close attention. Following the regional banking turmoil in 2023, regulators are applying greater scrutiny to banks' balance sheets, liquidity, and capital adequacy. C&F Financial could face stricter capital requirements or compliance burdens in the future, which could constrain its ability to lend, pursue acquisitions, or return capital to shareholders. The bank’s geographic concentration in Virginia, while a source of strength in a stable economy, also represents a vulnerability. A localized economic downturn in its core markets would have a more pronounced negative impact than it would on a more geographically diversified institution. Finally, its reliance on specific loan categories, such as its auto finance division, creates concentration risk that could amplify losses if that specific sector experiences a sharp decline.

Navigation

Click a section to jump

Current Price
71.14
52 Week Range
53.14 - 89.90
Market Cap
227.78M
EPS (Diluted TTM)
8.09
P/E Ratio
8.69
Forward P/E
0.00
Avg Volume (3M)
N/A
Day Volume
4,132
Total Revenue (TTM)
125.43M
Net Income (TTM)
26.17M
Annual Dividend
--
Dividend Yield
--